It's interesting how the law today is so backwards, compared to what it was supposed to be. For one, when we look at the US and the state constitutions, they specifically tell us what the government was established for. Also they outline unalienable rights that everyone has, which no person or institution (government) can take away.
The constitutions tell us that the purpose of the government is to "protect and maintain individual rights" so, until someone's rights have been violated, the government has no jurisdiction to do anything. Remember, they were established "for and by the people." Essentially this means that no government is above the people and no government can infringe upon your unalienable rights defined by the constitutions.
So, let's discuss the problems with traffic tickets:
1. Whose rights have been violated if I'm not wearing my seatbelt when driving down the freeway?
2. Whose rights have been violated if I did not come to a complete stop at a stop sign?
Whose rights are they protecting on almost all traffic tickets?
post a comment & Spread the word!
No comments:
Post a Comment